Monday, January 19, 2009

Self-Assessment (bonnie)

Increasingly, I am finding that my greatest strengths are also my greatest weaknesses, so it is hard for me to separate these two things. The following two strengths//weaknesses are important ones that have largely driven my life—how I am and how I act—though for a long time I did not realize them so clearly, and don’t fully understand them still.

Strength: Ritual//Spontaneity//Reflection

I have a tendency to be forgetful, spacey, and caught up in whatever I’m doing at the moment. To counter this, I have learned to plan, to use routine as a way to structure my life. When I plan and I stick to that plan I can get a lot done, and I can be responsible to myself and to others. However, I have learned to plan “so well” that more often than not, I over-plan. I get stuck in a rut of what I “must” do. I sometimes have trouble letting go enough to see what it is that I am doing and how I could be going about things differently.

I have found that I need to create reflective space in my life so that I’m not hemmed in to one sort of thinking or making and can consider what I’m doing. With reflective space, I can clearly see the paintings I’m painting, the writings I’m writing, and imagine other possibilities that I’ve not considered. With reflective space I can open my process back up when it is too closed or ritualized or close it off when it has become to open and spontaneous.

Weakness: Expectations//Trust//Patience//Frustration//Forgiving//Unforgiving

I am very patient and enduring person. I can stand a lot of hurt or annoyance or disappointment. From others I expect little more than respect, kindness, and engagement or a willingness to try. I trust people very easily and only when it’s clear that kindness is lacking do I flip over, unable to be patient anymore, and get frustrated and sometimes hurt. Usually, though this fades pretty quickly, as I can usually see the other person’s point of view and as I forgive others easily.

My weakness is that I have less patience for myself than for other people, by far. While it usually takes me a long time to get frustrated with or hurt by others, I get frustrated with myself quickly and easily. In short, I expect too much of myself—that I’ll get things faster than I do, that I’ll do more than I possibly can, and so on. I have trouble finding acceptance for myself; I am hard and unforgiving towards myself. I look at my work in this way, too, because I see it as part of myself, a reflection of who I am. This means that when I see something that I don’t like associated with myself in my work, I run from that and try to make it go away. I notice that I do this when I am bothered, afraid, scared, worried, or concerned about something. This practice of running away makes it very difficult to continue making work with much continuity. Recently I realized that I can let go of all the “goods” and “bads” to which I hold myself, and perhaps more importantly, I came to an effective way of doing it, but I am not very well practiced at this yet.

Future:

What’s next for me right now is painting more. Because I don’t have a lot of experience painting, I need to play, to do some constructive experiments where I try different painting techniques just to see what happens. Right now, I want to experiment with layering colors and I want to try painting larger. I am interested in color fields, in landscape painting (more or less), and in gestural mark-making, and I need to paint more to see where I want to take my work next.

Specifically this week, I’ve been thinking a lot about what I’m painting as well as how I’m getting there. I have been interested in air, atmosphere, and in-between spaces, where things meet. I still feel overwhelmed at not knowing what to paint because there are so many places where things meet—earth and sky at the horizon, water and earth at the riverside, tree against sky above the horizon, and so on.

How I want to paint is something that I have been questioning for a while, but especially since our last critique. My first watercolor drawings were abstractions derived from my experiences, but not drawn while looking at anything. My paintings on wood were the exact opposite of that—they are images that I held down, first by a camera, then carefully translated into paintings to so that the paintings are near replicas of those photographs. At the end of the semester I didn’t want to continue doing either one of those processes as I had been doing them before. I didn’t want to be only drawing from my head because I enjoy the engagement of looking as I draw. I also didn’t want to be painting only from photographs because they are so much about holding onto a passed experience and I am interested in a presentness of experience, a sensed and lived now. Reading about phenomenology only strengthened that interest. So how do I choose to paint my paintings? Do I paint from life? From my head? From both? Right now I have decided to try both options, to paint from life and abstractions, and perhaps forget these categories altogether. I will see what comes of it in time. The essential thing is to paint.

6 comments:

  1. I feel the exact way you do as far as your greatest strengths being your greatest weaknesses, being hard on yourself, being stuck on a path of what you "must" do, and fearing that your art defines to others who you are. This was revelatory on a very personal level, which surely was uncomfortable for you, but it helps us greatly to better understand you as a person and an artist.

    And based on your desire for windows in your studio space I feel that my last comment might now be unnecessary, but I will say it anyway: as far as the memory vs. photograph issue, why not direct observation? That was the part of your writing which really surprised and confused me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bonnie-

    I am interested in what you described as "reflective space". How do you create such a space? How are you able to open and close it? Tell me more. :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sarah, I can try to explain a little more, but it'd help to know what you were confused about. I think I realized over break how much I really missed drawing or painting from observation, and that's what I'm going to try for a while. I don't know that the paintings will stay looking like objects, but I want to be *looking*, even if the paintings become more about light and color than being a discrete "thing".

    I'm really interested in being somewhere when I'm there, and photographs take me away from that in a way. I also wasn't using them in a way that let me go anywhere in the paintings, beyond what was already in the photo, I mean. So, I know that they can be a useful tool, and I don't plan to get rid of them entirely as an option that I can use, but for now, I want to stay with sight and direct experience. Only when I want to *play* with photographs, going beyond what's there, will I pick them up again.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anne, "reflective space" is a phrase I just started using. Basically, I've been making sure that I regularly stop what I'm doing and look at what I'm making with the specific intention of reflection rather than judging and deciding where to go next. In other words, reflection time is intended to truly *reflect* on what is there--to *see* it and experience it, almost anew.

    Often when I'm making I get so caught up in what I'm doing that I feel like I can't *see* the work anymore, and then get surprised by things that people say about it. Last semester I would take time to write about my work and things that I was thinking about, but 99% of that was me trying to push or pull the work in a certain way. This sort of interaction with my work makes me feel claustrophobic. That's where the 'space' part comes in--I have to come into reflection feeling a sense of openness. Part of this is allowing enough time to really let the work sink in, and part of it is entering into that engagement with an intention to be non-judgemental.

    I'm still working on this, clearly, as it's something I've only started doing, but I'm finding it very helpful already.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think you may have misinterpreted my comment, or maybe I just misunderstood what you were trying to say in your 3-point. The response you gave me is exactly what I would have thought you would say when discussing your work or process. I was surprised and confused while reading your 3-point. I did not expect you to discuss a conflicting desire between drawing from photos and drawing from memory when it seemed that you had a natural inclination to work from observation--something it seemed you were not even considering.

    I might have misread your 3-point, but I just wanted to understand why you weren't considering working from observation, but were considering working from photos or from memory. Do you understand what I am trying to ask, or am I still not making sense?

    This is all a little irrelevant now, I suppose since in your response to me you said you are planning to work from observation. I guess my question now is, how will photos, observation, and memory come into play in your future work? Are these different means of creation important to your process and your final work? Will you be using combinations of the three or using them separately to create very different experiences?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I can't say concretely at this point what sort of role photos, observation, emotion and memory will play. The other night Anne came into my studio to see what I was doing, and I had just been working on a painting that has a sort of spotty texture and it was right next to these pieces of wood that an insect has eaten through so they're all porous and hole-y, and Anne asked if I was working from them. No. I was working from what I was seeing outside of my window, but I don't doubt that I was sort of working from them in a subconcious way. Right now I just don't think I can or even want to pin down and limit myself to one sort of way to come to a painting. I want my work to be about a collective experience, no more of this separating out "this was from a photo" or "this was a memory." Photos become our memories and our memories live on in our present which is filled with wonderful sensations that connect us to the world: our experience of the present actually holds everything--past, present, future. It is much looser than these defined categories, so why use them? why delineate?

    ReplyDelete